Grenoble Court of Appeal, 5 July 2018, Monsieur Louis L v. SAS Bonneval Emergence, no. 18/01877

A person subscribed to the capital increase of a company (“Company”) but backed-out shortly after, without succeeding in obtaining the restitution of the funds disbursed, even after having initiated proceedings before various trial judges. The Company initiated arbitral proceedings against the subscriber on the basis of the arbitration clause included in its bylaws. To overcome [...]

Grenoble Court of Appeal, 21 March 2018, Mr and Mrs B.C v. Brun Cosme and GWAXS Synergies, no. 18/00005

Following an improper execution of a support contract, two companies have been ordered to jointly pay, subject to penalty, 36 000 euros to two of their clients. This ones have thus challenged the order by considering that the “judge for interim relief” did not have jurisdiction by the arbitration clause contained in the contract. By [...]

Go to Top