Yukos shareholders sought the reconsideration of the denial of their application to compel discovery. The discovery aimed at obtaining all communications among attorneys within the respondent firm, involving its long-standing client Rosneft and Russian Federation. The petitioners claimed Rosneft had manipulated Armenian Yukos-related proceedings. The Court dismissed the application finding no “clear error” occurred or “manifest injustice” resulted from the denial of their discovery demands to respondents.